Why Injured Service Members Deserve Career Reassignment, Not Discharge
- Kirk Carlson
- 2 days ago
- 3 min read

Each year, thousands of American service members are honorably discharged not because of misconduct or a lack of commitment, but because they sustained injuries or illnesses during training. These are individuals who volunteered to serve, passed rigorous entry standards, and were fully prepared to defend our nation. Yet, due to injuries—often sustained in boot camp, field exercises, or other military duties—they are labeled “non-deployable” and dismissed from service. Their careers are ended before they truly begin.
This system isn’t just flawed—it’s unjust.
🚨 The Hidden Impact of Medical Discharges
For many service members, a medical discharge represents more than a medical note—it’s a life-altering detour. These veterans frequently leave the military without:
Career advancement or the ability to serve in a new, modified capacity
Long-term VA benefits or full access to the GI Bill
Recognition equal to that of their peers who served longer or deployed
Retirement credits or stability to support their families
Worse, many find themselves without a support network, carrying both physical injuries and emotional trauma—including guilt, shame, and a deep sense of abandonment.
⚖️ Why Career Reassignment Is the Right Solution
We live in an era where workplace accommodations are expected across civilian sectors. So why doesn’t the military provide similar accommodations to injured personnel who still wish to serve?
Career reassignment offers a middle ground between a full medical discharge and frontline duty. It allows service members to:
Continue contributing in roles that match their current physical abilities
Apply their leadership, technical, or administrative skills in non-combat positions
Retain access to essential benefits they’ve earned
Exit the military on their own terms—when they are ready
This is not a matter of charity. It’s a matter of justice, duty, and investment in human potential.
📉 The Cost of Losing Trained Talent
It takes tens of thousands of dollars to train a single service member. From basic training to advanced schooling and specialty certifications, the Department of Defense makes a considerable investment in every recruit. When a trained individual is medically discharged early, that investment is lost.
Instead of reaping the long-term value of skilled personnel in alternate roles, the military system essentially “throws away” capable individuals who could continue serving in meaningful ways.
This isn’t just bad for morale—it’s inefficient.
🔄 The Precedent Already Exists
Other branches of government—and even some areas of the military—have demonstrated that reassignment works. Service members who transition to administrative, instructional, logistical, or support roles have gone on to build successful careers. They train new recruits, manage resources, write policy, and help maintain operational readiness.
Why not make this a standard, rather than an exception?
🧭 What We Must Do
The #ReasonableRanks campaign is calling on Congress, the Department of Defense, and military leadership to enact the following reforms:
Mandate Career Reassignment Evaluation before discharging an injured service member.
Create designated non-combat roles for those who can continue to serve in a modified capacity.
Ensure benefit retention for anyone discharged due to a verified service-related injury.
Acknowledge and honor training-related injuries as legitimate sacrifices in service to country.
🫡 Final Thoughts
We honor our troops not just by thanking them, but by fighting for them when the system fails. Injured service members deserve the same dignity and opportunity as anyone who wore the uniform.
Career reassignment is not a compromise—it’s common sense. It upholds our national values of loyalty, fairness, and perseverance. And most of all, it ensures that no one is left behind for simply getting hurt while answering the call to serve.
Let’s fix the system. Let’s give every injured veteran the chance to finish what they started.
Comments